• Pages

  • About me

    I am currently working at Capgemini Norge AS since august 2008, in the department for Business Information Management. As a student at the University of Oslo, I did research on open source communities and Novell. Check out my about page or read my published thesis!
  • Blog Stats

    • 14,570 hits
  • RSS Lolcats

    • Cats Love To Work Out
    • Cat Pile Is The Game We All Need Right Meow!
      Remember that oh so fun game Jenga? Ya, the one where you build a full tower and one by one take out pieces until someone takes the wrong one and it all comes falling down?! Now you're probably smiling and thinking of all those fun memories! Well, luckily for the cat lovers and jenga lovers out there... there is a new game which sorta combines them both […]

Abstract

My thesis was submitted to the University of Oslo yesterday, 14. of May. Be sure to visit my thesis-page and have a look at it! Here is the abstract from the publication:

The interest and use of open source software and methodology has gained an increasing amount of commercial attention, and we are currently witnessing that established proprietary software firms are taking a step further by opening their own software projects in an attempt to create firm-sponsored open source communities. Siobhan O’Mahony’s research finds that these firms have to handle a tension between openness and control in their product development, but little research has been done to detail how this balance is achieved. I have studied the American software company Novell and the openSUSE project, largely guided by an inductive, qualitative approach supplemented by some quantitative methods. In the study I draw upon Niklas Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems to create a distinction between the sponsor firm and the sponsored community, and I investigate the mechanisms that hold the two systems together despite their differences in interests. I argue that there are several elements that ensure a tight coupling between the two systems, including the boundary objects situated between them, the shared communication channels and the efforts of the marginal people whom have roles in both systems. A primary contribution to the theory of boundary objects is a distinction between what I describe as supportive-objects and target-objects. I argue that the latter holds a strong motivating power that should be appended to our understanding of individuals’ and collectives’ motivation to participate in open source software projects. I explore several possible future scenarios for the evolution of firm-sponsored communities, and find that Novell is pursuing a strategy for managing openness in such a community.

Keywords: FLOSS, managing communities, open innovation, boundary objects, marginal people, autopoietic social systems, Luhmann

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. Yo!
    Etter å ha lest dette, vil jeg selvsagt gjerne lese resten!
    Ha en Super Sommer!!

  2. Congratulations Freddy. I am so proud of you. And what a lovely concept sharing it with everyone. YAY!

    I will probably finish reading it in the next few days and return with some feedback.

    Enjoy your next few weeks and see you in Barcelona.

    Big hug, Fatma

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: